There's been already some internal progress in that direction, but as trivial as it might seem from the outside, it requires substantial changes of the internal structure. Now, disregarding Texmaker, the request for multiline arguments has been discussed and is a known limitation in TXS: As explained by Jan, you can achieve the same effect in TXS by statically activating biblatex.cwl in options/completion. In particular for \usepackage it statically assumes that \addbibresource is a known command which indicates a bib file. There's no connection between TXS and Texmaker, except that TXS still contains some of the Texmaker code from 2009.Īpart from that, I don't think that " multiline arguments are working in TexMaker". It shouldnt be too hard to parse the tex file for any reference to the bib package right Maybe. In software engineering, a project fork happens when developers take a copy of source code from one software package and start independent development on it, creating a distinct and separate piece of software. bib file thats preventing bibtex from parsing it correctly. tex PdfLaTeX: pdflatex -synctex1 -interactionnonstopmode. So here’s the right (standard) configuration: LaTeX: latex -interactionnonstopmode. tex as a placeholder for the file to compile. There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of the concept of a fork Basically, you just enter what you would enter when compiling from the command line, just with.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |